Conference Program
The 45th International Hume Society Conference
Hosted by the Institute of Philosophy,
Research Centre for the Humanities,
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Budapest, Hungary
July 23th-27th 2018
Directors
Miren Boehm (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee)
Tamas Demeter (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Mark Spencer (Brock University)
Margaret Watkins (Saint Vincent College)
The Hume Society is pleased to announce its 45th annual conference.
Program:
Monday, 23 July
Rachel Cohon (University at Albany, SUNY)
Tito Magri (Sapienza University of Rome)
Amy Schmitter (University of Alberta)
1) Pedro Faria (University of Cambridge): “Justice, Economic Activity and the Reframing of Hume’s Social Theory, 1740-1752”
Commentator: Ferenc Horcher (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
2) Sarah Paquette (Portland State University): “Belief Revisions in the Context of Hume’s Treatise and Contemporary Psychology”
Commentator: Katharina Paxman (Brigham Young University)
Tuesday, 24 July
1) Nathan Sasser (Greenville Technical College): “The Vulgar Belief in Body is Defeasibly Justified”
Commentator: Yongguang Nong (University of Edinburgh)
2) Mikko Tolonen (University of Helsinki) and Ville Vaara (University of Helsinki): “A Quantitative Approach to Royalist and Whig Sources in Hume’s History of England”
Commentator: Mark Towsey (University of Liverpool)
1) Alexis Glenn (Brown University): “Hume’s History as Virtuous Hermeneutics: Toward a Humean Sense of Piety”
Commentator: Gregory Todd (Independent Scholar)
2) Dan Kervick (Independent Scholar): “Hume Against the Geometers: Extension and Geometry in Hume’s Treatise”
Commentator: Donald Baxter (University of Connecticut)
James Harris (University of St. Andrews)
Hsueh Qu (National University of Singapore)
Jacqueline Taylor (University of San Francisco)
1) Jason Fisette (University of Nevada, Reno): “Politeness and the Common Good in Hume’s Political Philosophy”
Commentator: Manuel Vasquez Villavicencio (Université du Québec à Montréal)
2) Todd Ryan (Trinity College): “Philo’s Second Circumstance: Malebranche and the General Law Theodicy in Hume’s Dialogues
Commentator: Lewis Powell (University at Buffalo, SUNY)
Wednesday, 25 July
Author: Dennis Rasmussen (Tufts University): The Infidel and the Professor: David Hume, Adam Smith, and the Friendship That Shaped Modern Thought
Critics:
Michael Gill (University of Arizona)
John Scott (University of California, Davis)
1) Lorenzo Greco (University of Oxford): “Varieties of Humean Virtue Ethics”
Commentator: Jennifer Welchman (University of Alberta)
2) Tom Pye (King’s College, Cambridge): “Hume, Montesquieu, and English History”
Commentator: Marc Hanvelt (Carleton University)
1) Laura Nicolí (Lichtenberg Kolleg): “The Line and the Circle: the Natural History of Religion and the French”
Commentator: Andre Willis (Brown University)
2) Dan O’Brien (Oxford Brookes University): “Hume and Virtue Epistemology”
Commentator: Ann Levey (University of Calgary)
1) Bowen Chan (University of Toronto): “Scepticism, Custom, and Hume: Philosophy’s Place in Common Life”
Commentator: Karánn Durland (Austin College)
2) Getty Lustila (Brown University): “Enthusiasm and Modesty in Hume’s History”
Commentator: Liz Goodnick (Metropolitan State University)
Thursday, 26 July
Kate Abramson (Indiana University, Bloomington)
Stefanie Rocknak (Hartwick College)
Anik Waldow (University of Sydney)
1) Lorraine Besser (Middlebury College): “A Humean Theory of Compassion”
Commentator: Esther Kroeker (University of Antwerp)
2) Naohito Mori (Kochi University): “On Whether the Tudor Government was an ‘Absolute Monarchy’: Reconsidering Hume’s View of the Rise of the Civilized Society”
Commentator: Max Skjonsberg (University of York)
1) Peter Millican (University of Oxford): “Hume’s Decisive Turn Away from Egoism”
Commentator: John P. Wright (Central Michigan University)
2) Wade Robison (Rochester Institute of Technology): “Hume, Descartes, and Adam: Hume’s Project”
Commentator: Karen Valihora (York University)
Friday, 27 July
1) Alison McIntyre (Wellesley College): “Does Anger Represent Its Object as Evil? Hume vs. Malebranche and Hutcheson at T 2.3.3.5”
Commentator: Angela Calvo de Saavedra (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana)
2) Ryu Susato (Keio University): “‘Barometer of the Nation’: Hume’s View of Usury and Interest in the History of England”
Commentator: Spiros Tegos (University of Crete)
1) Keith Hankins (Chapman University) and John Thrasher (Monash University): “The Puzzle of Hume’s Politics”
Commentator: William Lemmens (University of Antwerp)
2) Christopher Williams (University of Nevada, Reno): “Absent Matters of Fact”
Commentator: Ruth Weintraub (Tel-Aviv University)
1) Wendel de Holanda Pereira Campelo (Federal University of Minas Gerais): “Hume’s Principle concerning the Existence of Mind-Independent Objects”
Commentator: Benjamin Nelson (University of Connecticut)
2) Amyas Merivale (University of Oxford): “The Integrity of Hume’s Four Dissertations”
Commentator: Jane McIntyre